• About

Zak From Downunder

~ Zak de Courcy's sometimes incendiary thoughts about politics, life and religion.

Zak From Downunder

Tag Archives: Julia Gillard

Tony’s Night of the Long Knives Beckons

30 Friday Jan 2015

Posted by Zak de Courcy in Australian Politics

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Australia, Australian politics, Julia Gillard, Julie Bishop, Liberal Party, Malcolm Turnbull, Murdoch Press, Rupert Murdoch, Tony Abbott

A certain foreign minister recently dined with the svengali of Australian politics, Rupert Murdoch. Why is that significant? Because, Murdoch doesn’t do these things just to be ‘sociable‘. I think he did it because he’s formed a view that unless Tony Abbott goes, the Libs will get hammered at the next election. He’s a man who cherishes his role as our puppeteer in chief and was needed to give Julie Bishop the green light to go for it. No worries, the decks are clear; the memo’s gone out to the editors of the Telegraph, Courier-Mail, Herald Sun and Sunday Times…..

Julie Bishop

Foreign Minister Bishop

And the bad news is that Julie Bishop will soon be Rupert’s new plaything and Australia’s prime minister (with Malcolm Turnbull as Treasurer). And the news gets even worse because, unlike Julia Gillard who had the Murdoch press baying for her blood for 3 years, Julie Bishop will get a magic carpet ride from the same propaganda song sheet.

It’ll be interesting to look back on this post in a couple of months to see that I was right.

To those who think Minister for Inhuman Services, Scott Morrison will get the top job, I sincerely hope you’re wrong.
I think even the hard right in the Liberal Party (who are currently in control) will see Morrison as too much of a ‘lightning rod’ for PM but as a ‘can-do’ hardnut treasurer, they’ll love it (that’s if the pragmatists who are currently holding their noses and supporting Turnbull, can’t dissuade them). If they do go for Morrison, it’ll be time to start looking out for fluttering squarish flags with a black motif on a red background.


What do you think? Who do you think will replace Abbott?

:: Please leave a comment ::


Run Mr. Rabbit!

26 Wednesday Jun 2013

Posted by Zak de Courcy in Australian Politics

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

ALP, asylum seekers, Australian Labor Party, Australian politics, carbon price, Chris Bowen, climate change, economy, election, elections, federal government, Indonesia, Julia Gillard, Kevin Rudd, leadership, Malcolm Turnbull, motion of no-confidence, people smugglers, racism, Tony Abbott, turn back the boats

Tony Abbott

Tony Abbott

Tony Abbott’s body language at tonight’s press conference (where unusually, he answered questions) suggested that he’s worried that he’s got a fight on his hands. I think he hoped some of the independents would desert Labor by supporting a no-confidence motion tomorrow to hasten the election and bring forward his Liberal Party’s resumption of its ‘right to rule’.

It seems the cat’s out of the bag… he knows he doesn’t have the numbers.

 

In response to a question regarding the possibility of a no-confidence vote, Mr. Abbott said:
“Well, look, that’s really a matter for Mr Rudd. I’m not interested in playing parliamentary games. I think the people of Australia are sick of parliamentary games…”
Reading between the lines, it seems he’s recognized that he doesn’t have the numbers to force a no-confidence motion (thanks Bob Katter for your decisive support for Kevin).

Tony Abbott continued, “I am interested in giving the people their say as soon as possible and it was really quite odd that Mr Rudd didn’t confirm the former Prime Minister’s chosen election date – or indeed announce an earlier date…”
Clearly, Tony’s hoping for an early August election (the earliest we could have) but would settle for Julia Gillard’s September date. What he doesn’t want is for Prime Minister Kevin Rudd to have an opportunity to get anything done and build towards an election, perhaps as late as 24 November (the latest possible date for an election) but more likely mid October. Tony strangely implored Rudd to announce an early election date and sounded almost acquiescent in the doing.

What Tony doesn’t want is for the focus to be turned to his paucity of policy and the illogic of many of the Opposition’s pronouncements. Under Julia Gillard, the opposition Coalition has been given a free pass on their many ludicrous assertions, Tony Abbott stunts and carping negativity. Now that the Abbott/Gillard nexus has been broken, Mr. Abbott faces the unpleasant prospect of scrutiny.

Returning to the tired old mantra that has served him so well over the last 3 years, Mr. Abbott attempted to frame the terms of the election as:
“Who do you, the people, trust to stop the boats, to abolish the carbon tax and the mining tax and to get the budget back in the black?”

I think the answer to the first question might be The Age Newspaper and ABC News who just exposed the links between Indonesian people smugglers and allegedly corrupt elements of law enforcement. The Indonesians might be forced to act against the long-suspected rats in their ranks, which in turn might slow the boats. Let’s face it, the only difference between the current government and opposition ‘stop the boats’ policies, is Tony Abbott’s pledge to turn back the asylum seeker boats (after they’ve glued the scuttled boats back together, that is). I’ve got a feeling Rudd will articulate the obvious flaws in Abbott’s policy a lot better than Julia Gillard ever managed. As well, Julia fell into Abbott’s trap of framing asylum seekers as a threat to our sovereignty (border security). Perhaps now, Rudd will be able to refocus the boats issue as a leaky, sinking boats humanitarian crisis. Perhaps he can pressure Indonesia to stop the boats leaving port and also encourage them to work to stem the inflow into Indonesia of asylum seekers who buy visas, enabling them time to transit to Australia bound boats. In return Australia should quietly agree to increase our refugee intake from Indonesia to a few thousand from the present few hundred. There’s been no headlines screaming about breached border security when asylum seekers fly in, so getting the leaky boats off the daily newscasts and asylum seekers into airports instead, might just diffuse Tony Abbott’s racist pandering border security/turn back the boats ‘Labor: death by a thousand cuts’ strategy.

See the ABC story and video here:
• Footage shows Indonesian people smuggler discussing his business and boasts police involvement
(George Roberts, ABC News 25 June 2013)
See the Age video here:
• Hidden camera exposes people smuggler
(The Age, 25 June 2013)
Read the Sydney Morning herald story here:
• Jakarta pushed on people smugglers
(Michael Bachelard, The Sydney Morning Herald 26 June 2013)

Kevin Rudd

Kevin Rudd

I’m also looking forward to seeing Kevin Rudd’s changes in the carbon price that will probably ditch the current 2015 time-table and bring in the ETS a year ahead of schedule, thereby blunting some of Abbott’s shallow rhetoric and turning the spotlight back on his own derided “direct action” policy. Hell, even Malcolm Turnbull, the Liberal Party’s former Environment spokesman, believes that Tony Abbott’s Climate Change policy is a crock of shit. This is what he had to say about it, “…the fact is that Tony and the people who put him in his job, do not want to do anything about climate change. They do not believe in human caused global warming. As Tony observed on one occasion “climate change is crap” or if you consider his mentor, Senator Minchin, the world is not warming, it’s cooling and the climate change issue is part of a vast left wing conspiracy to deindustrialise the world.”

Next: The Mineral Resource Rents Tax (MRRT) is a non-starter. Given that its legislation was practically written by the Mining Industry, and it’s raised so little revenue, it can’t seriously be seen as having any adverse impact on anything other than the government’s bottom line. All Rudd needs to do is acknowledge the tax needs some tweaking and move on. Keep in mind that the predecessor of the MRRT, the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax (PRRT), has operated with little controversy, and barely a ripple of attention, since 1987.

Of all Tony Abbott’s chosen fields of battle, the doozy is going to be watching him try to cogently explain how he’s going to get the budget back into the black quicker than Labor. Julia Gillard and Wayne Swan had failed to adequately enunciate the folly of Abbott and shadow treasurer Joe Hockey’s maths and the diabolical reality of the European style austerity that would be inevitable under an Abbott Administration; inevitable that is, if everything they’ve said they’ll do hasn’t just been a great big new block of fudge to add to their huge black hole in the cooked books from the last election. Sure, Abbott and Hockey can hack the legs off the poor by slashing the public service and the safety net; sure, they can intensify the devastation and violence of American style ghettoisation of ‘working poor’ urban areas like much of Detroit; sure, they can slash investment in Australia’s educated future and continue Australia’s slide down the international rankings; sure, they can reverse the Gillard government’s gains in healthcare; and sure, they can end Labor’s support for struggling parents such as the school kids education payments. This slash and burn austerity will also need to be enacted within a framework of falling revenues as the Carbon Price is terminated, stripping billions from the budget. This dark austerity cloud will also hang in sharp contrast to Abbott’s enormously generous Paid Parental Leave Scheme that will pay according to lifestyle rather than need. Enormously generous that is, if you’re earning up to $150,000 a year, as the scheme matches parental income, confirming that in the eyes of Tony Abbott, an affluent baby deserves a hell of a lot more comfort and pampering than a poor baby.

It’ll be interesting to see how Mr. Abbott tries to wriggle out of this minefield of commitments he has so recklessly laid for himself over the last 3 years.

In the last 3 years, Julia Gillard and Wayne Swan have frustratingly missed just about every point in countering Abbott’s hollow propositions as they inexplicably allowed Tony and his wrecking crew to run rings around them. I can’t see the articulate pair of Prime Minister Rudd and his new Treasurer Chris Bowen, suffering from the same communication paralysis.

It’s going to be very difficult for Kevin Rudd to get even some of the ducks in a row for the coming election (another reason I think he’ll go later rather than sooner) but at least the government wont be rigid with fear as they have been til now. Shuffling so many new bums onto ministerial seats is also going to be a feat of immense engineering. Getting everyone briefed and quickly up to speed might also flash reminders of the heady days just after the 2007 election. Let’s hope Rudd gets a little honeymoon to settle the team in before the election campaign proper gets firing and the media blood-sport starts again in earnest.

The frustrating spectacle of Julia Gillard and Wayne Swan mangling perfectly defendable positions into hopelessly spun quicksand, is over. Now the business of injecting hope into the despairing government and disillusioned voters, begins.

Good luck Kevin 13.

More
See video and transcript of Kevin’s press conference here:
• Kevin Rudd aims to ‘forge consensus’ in politics after victory over Julia Gillard, 26 June 2013

See the transcript of Tony Abbott’s press conference remarks here:
• Tony Abbott Press Conference, 26 June 2013


So sad that Australia’s first female prime minister wasn’t able to translate the relaxed and sometimes witty Education Minister into an articulate and publicly effective Prime Minister. At least she’ll always be the first, so her place in history is secured.

Let’s hope Kevin can pull even a mangy rabbit out of the hat. What are your thoughts on today’s explosive events?

:: Please leave a comment ::


The Leaderless, Leadership Spill:

22 Friday Mar 2013

Posted by Zak de Courcy in Australian Politics

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

ALP, Australian politics, federal government, Julia Gillard, Labor, leadership, Simon Crean, spill, Tony Abbott

Last Monday, the 11th of March, just after Labor’s WA State election disaster, I sent the following letter to all Labor members of the House of Representatives and also enclosed my It’s Time! or It’s Over! post. I’ve reproduced the letter here, to indicate my level of consternation at the current leadership crisis and the inept way in which the Labor Party are dealing with the issue.

Dear Member,

In two weeks, it will effectively be too late to salvage any possibility of winning an election in September or alternatively, saving the great Australian Labor Party from a wipeout.

In two weeks, parliament goes into recess and won’t return until the Budget in May. What the Caucus does now, will have a huge impact on the number of vulnerable members lost in the election in September (or whenever it is held).

I can only imagine the pressure you all must be experiencing at the moment, having survived the last two years with the constant noise from the media, Tony Abbott and a clamoring public, the relentless polls, and an 8 month election campaign to endure.

As a retired member of the ALP and supporter of more than 30 years, it distresses me to envision what lies in wait for the party at the election in September. And while I’ve never welcomed the arrival of a Liberal Coalition government, I’ve rarely been more apprehensive of the possibility.

The normal cycle of politics allows for centre-left and centre-right parties to periodically gain the ascendancy in Australia without the sky falling in.
This is a juncture in history when that’s not the case. With a climate system in crisis, this country can not afford a few years while an Abbott government does its best to unwind the Carbon Price, with a Climate change sceptic at the helm, fiddling while we burn. Nor can we afford the butchering of the NBN and the fiscal shock that will result from an Abbott razor-gang, slashing into the public sector in a show of mettle.

It may be that you have already concluded, from internal polling, that your government will not win the next election with or without the current Prime Minister. You may also have been convinced to stay the present course, no matter what. If, however, you have a glimmer of hope, then would you please take a few minutes to have a quick look at my enclosed blog post on this subject (posted 11-03-2013).

I’m not arrogant enough to think I have any special insight but I’m concerned enough to hope that there might be something, somewhere in what I’ve written, that might strike a chord.

Yours in Solidarity,
Zak Seager
St. James, WA

The Farcical Spill:

Simon Crean-sm Yesterday’s farce of a leadership challenge, did nothing to resolve the issue. The push by Regional Australia Minister, and stalwart Gillard supporter, Simon Crean to bring the issue to a head, would only have succeeded had the Prime Minister resigned. Clearly, his discussion with Julia Gillard, the night before he moved, was the proverbial tap on the shoulder from a loyal and respected colleague that tells a leader, the time is up. Julia is not a leader, it seems, who will go quietly into the night, with her dignity intact. She is a leader who appears ready to defend her castle until every bit of it, the Labor Party included, is destroyed.

By reputation, Mr. Crean is a veteran politician of demonstrable courage, loyalty and principle and a man who would not lightly go to his leader as he did on Wednesday. At the February 2012 leadership bloodbath, Simon Crean was one of Julia Gillard’s most vocal and loyal soldiers.

When he fronted the media on Thursday morning, there was no eagerness for the contest. Instead it was the grave and deeply troubled look on Simon Crean’s face that told of his desire to make the change with as little blood in the water for the encircling Opposition sharks to frenzy over. In making his statement prior to yesterday’s leadership spill, Crean explained that he felt he needed to take the action in the interest of his party and the nation. Without explicitly saying so, he hearkened back to an earlier age when the ALP stood for something, values an electorate could support.

In his statement, Mr. Crean said, “This is an issue that has to be resolved. There’s too much at stake. This is a very regretful decision for me. I think everyone knows the relationship between the Prime Minister and myself goes back some time. This is not personal, this is about the party, its future, and the future of the country. I actually believe we can win the next election. I believe that the agenda that is there but not understood well enough, as reflected in many of the comments that come back. We need to settle this and move forward.”.

He continued, “I’m doing this in the interest of the Labor Party and in turn, the nation. I believe that the great things that I was part of in the Hawke-Keating Government: great decisions; bold decisions; decisions that went through due process; difficult decisions; the decisions built around consensus; the decisions built round bringing people together; the decisions around growing the economy, as we have demonstrated in government, we can do; growing it for a purpose; for fairness; for distribution; for the values that I, like so many others, joined the Labor Party for. We can’t win from the position we’re in, in the polls. I don’t believe our future and our chances in the polls, is just going to be determined by a simple change of leader. People have got to believe, we have conviction, that we believe in what we stand for, there’s a coherence of message and we are determined to pursue it. What we have to do is to take people with us. That means being prepared to argue the case. And I know this, I know the people do not want an Abbott led government. I get so many people in frustration to me saying, ‘we are not going to allow that man to lead this country, are we?’.”

  • See the full text of Simon Crean’s statement here.

That Julia Gillard and Wayne Swan were the only candidates at yesterday’s meeting did not indicate the level of support for their leadership. The returning officer made it clear that there was no vote. What the result did indicate, is that, the Prime Minister knew the numbers were not yet there for a bloody and extremely damaging contest.

After the vote, the Prime Minister said, “I accept [the party’s] continuing support of me as Prime Minister and Labor leader with a deep sense of humility,”. This statememt is a prime example of the disconnect between reality and spin in this current crisis. If Ms Gillard had resigned with a deep sense of humility, that might have been believable.

That almost all the government members tasked with ensuring party unity, chief whip Joel Fitzgibbon, and whips Ed Husic and Janelle Saffin, have now publically withdrawn their support of the Prime Minister and resigned, is an indication that this leadership stoush is far from over.

The only winner so far, on the Government side, is Kevin Rudd, who took a big stride towards his rehabilitation by refusing to challenge. He clearly recognizes that a challenge now would amount to a capitulation at the election, a step he’s not prepared to take. In his statement yesterday, he said that he would honour his pledge not to challenge and that he wouldn’t return to the leadership unless the Prime Minister resigned or he was ‘drafted’ by an overwhelming majority of his colleagues. He enhanced his position, rightly or wrongly, as someone who is prepared to put the interests of the Labor Party and the country before his own. He also astutely contrasted this with Julia Gillard’s apparent willingness to cling to power at any cost.

With barely contained glee beneath feigned gravity, Opposition leader, Tony Abbott, asked “How long must this circus last?”

Well that was the question that Simon Crean bravely tried to answer yesterday before he was sacked. And it’s a question that will hang over the Government until Julia Gillard recognizes that she and Wayne Swan are toxic to Labor’s election prospects. Every day she delays the inevitable, drives the number of vulnerable government members that will be lost at the election, just that much higher.

The Prime Minister has been regularly commended as a tough and astute politician. She needs to add good judgment to the list and see she has no future as Prime Minister and resign for the good of the Labor Party and Australia.


Is this the end of the leadership instability or is there yet another chapter to this saga?

:: Please leave a comment ::


Simon Crean’s Statement:

22 Friday Mar 2013

Posted by Zak de Courcy in Australian Politics

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

ALP, Australian politics, federal government, Julia Gillard, Labor, leadership, Simon Crean, spill, Tony Abbott

Here is the full text of Simon Crean’s statement given before the Labor leadership spill on 21 March 2013.

Simon Crean-sm Something needs to be done to break this deadlock, to resolve the issue once and for all and to enable us to get on with the job we’re actually elected to do and that is to campaign on behalf of Australian people, through labor values. I have talked to the Prime Minister, yesterday and today, and as a result of that conversation, I informed her that I would think about my position and get back to her before I made this announcement; That I am asking her to call a spill of all leadership positions in the Party.

I will not be standing for the leader. I will be putting myself forward in the leadership team for the deputy leader. If the Prime Minister does not agree to it, which I expect she wont, then I urge members of Caucus to petition in the appropriate way, for the calling of such a meeting. This is an issue that has to be resolved. There’s too much at stake.

This is a very regretful decision for me. I think everyone knows the relationship between the Prime Minister and myself goes back some time. This is not personal, this is about the party, its future, and the future of the country. I actually believe we can win the next election. I believe that the agenda that is there but not understood well enough, as reflected in many of the comments that come back. We need to settle this and move forward.

As for the position of the positions being declared open, Kevin Rudd, in my view, has no alternative but to stand for the leadership. He can’t continue to play the game that says he’s reluctant or he has to be drafted. I know that the party will not draft him. I know the party is looking for change and clear air and they don’t see that simply by changing the leader. That’s why I’m putting myself forward as part of the leadership group to demonstrate that we are serious about not just changing leaders, but of actually showing leadership. That’s what we’re elected to do, that’s what I want to be part of. I think in all my life, my public life, I’ve demonstrated that is the driving force. For me, the position itself, again, is not a personal one that I’m taking. I’m doing this in the interest of the Labor Party and in turn, the nation.

I believe that the great things that I was part of in the Hawke-Keating Government: great decisions; bold decisions; decisions that went through due process; difficult decisions; the decisions built around consensus; the decisions built round bringing people together; the decisions around growing the economy, as we have demonstrated in government, we can do; growing it for a purpose; for fairness; for distribution; for the values that I, like so many others, joined the Labor Party for.

We can’t win from the position we’re in, in the polls. I don’t believe our future and our chances in the polls, is just going to be determined by a simple change of leader. People have got to believe, we have conviction, that we believe in what we stand for, there’s a coherence of message and we are determined to pursue it. What we have to do is to take people with us. That means being prepared to argue the case. And I know this, I know the people do not want an Abbott led government. I get so many people in frustration to me saying, ‘we are not going to allow that man to lead this country, are we?’. Now, I agree with that from an obvious point of view, but the truth is there is a mood out there that does not want him but is fed up with us at the moment. We’ve got to change it.

I hope this circuit breaker does it and I look forward to the Caucus taking a mature decision in the interest of their future and this country’s future.


Was Simon Crean’s action: courageous, foolhardy, naive, or fiendishly calculated?

:: Please leave a comment ::


Time to Go, Julia!

20 Wednesday Mar 2013

Posted by Zak de Courcy in Australian Politics

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

ALP, Australian politics, challenge, federal government, Julia Gillard, Kevin Rudd, Labor, Tony Abbott

With the level of backgrounding seemingly exploding in Canberra at the moment, you’d think that the move must be on to replace Julia Gillard. The trouble is, the Prime Minister must also surely know, that a leadership challenge now would be absolutely fatal for Labor’s electoral chances and to force her colleagues into that position would be unforgivable.

The unbridled venom unleashed against Kevin Rudd during the February 2012 leadership contest, was so viscous that it ensured another challenge would be impossible. I don’t think the electorate has forgotten that it seemed Prime Minister Gillard and her key supporters, with the exception of Stephen Smith, had lost the plot and decided that a scorched earth was preferable to Rudd’s return. Their reckless action also provided Opposition leader, Tony Abbott with a plethora of footage and quotes to help destroy Labor at the next election.

Incalculable damage has already been inflicted on the Government’s chances of surviving this current crisis. If Prime Minister Gillard continues with her visibly desperate attempts to cling to power, there’ll only be a carcass of a government remaining and Labor’s chances of saving a rump of the party let alone winning the election, will be dead.

If there is to be any hope for her party members, she should do the honourable thing, resign now and quietly present a new leader, someone who has a glimmer of a chance to lead. And, by glimmer, I don’t mean Simon Crean! There’s chat about that he might be tapped for the job. But while he seems decent enough, he was dumped as party leader 10 years ago for a reason.

There must be someone in the government who can believably string words together, look us sincerely in the eye and tell the electorate why an Abbott government would be such a devastating outcome for Australia.

Also check out:
• Trouble brewing, but don’t blame it on the usual bloke by Peter Hartcher.
(Age, 19 March 2013)


Will/should Julia see the tide and resign or will she continue to tune out the clamour with her “tin ear”?

:: Please leave a comment ::


It’s Time! or It’s Over!

11 Monday Mar 2013

Posted by Zak de Courcy in Australian Politics, WA Politics

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Australian politics, Bill Shorten, Julia Gillard, politics, Stephen Smith, Tanya Plibersek, Tony Abbott, WA politics

The weekend election in WA has brought the fate of federal Labor into sharp focus. Although the swing in the primary vote against Mark McGowan’s State ALP team was a little over 2%, with the collapse in the Greens vote, the 2-party preferred swing of almost 7%, produced a bitter result for Labor.

Various pollsters have put the Gillard ‘drag’ effect, on the ALP in the West, at between 1.5 and 2 percent. This accounts for almost all the primary loss for McGowan’s WA Labor team. The retirement of the iconic, Bob Brown has undoubtedly caused some of the drop in the Greens vote. But when the third party vote collapses as has recent support for the Greens, it suggests that sharp differences have brought voters back to a choice between ‘Black and White’. The Greens generally provide a reliable stream of preferences to Labor. But, with most of the slumped Greens primary vote leaking to the Coalition, this is bad news for Labor.

Defence Minister, Stephen Smith
Defence Minister, Stephen Smith

Defence Minister, Stephen Smith conceded on the weekend that federal Labor had caused a “drag” on McGowan’s chances. The always colourful, former WA Labor planning minister Alannah MacTiernan went further, saying the party faced an “absolute massacre” in the federal election and called on Prime Minister Julia Gillard to resign. On Monday, she told ABC news that she believed the result for federal Labor could be even worse than that suffered by McGowan in WA, such was the animosity towards the Prime Minister that she heard in the electorate. “It’s pretty simple and it’s pretty brutal,” Ms MacTiernan said. “They’re saying they don’t like Julia Gillard, they don’t believe her”, she added. “The overwhelming reportage from the doorstop, from the shopping centres, was that people were saying, in Labor heartland, they were saying ‘ok we’ll vote for you guys but no way are we voting for federal Labor and Julia Gillard‘. And if we do not take note of this there is going to be an absolute massacre in the federal election.”

While Ms. MacTiernan can often be relied on to shoot from the hip, she voices an opinion that is haboured by many alarmed Labor members and supporters.

The Prime Minister’s caravan tour to Rooty Hill and western Sydney last week, looked like a stunt, walked like a stunt and was a stunt. About all that came from it were traffic stop opportunities which showcased Ms Gillard’s makeover, with her stylish new eye-wear and suits, and a clumsy attempt at worker solidarity with her attack on 457 visas. Whether her points about the exploitation of 457 visas have any validity, is another issue. The fact is, her handling of the issue was terrible. You know the Prime Minister is in dangerous territory when the Xenophobic Pauline Hanson supports her. And the optics of Gillard’s own British media adviser, John McTernan, working here with a 457 visa, standing in back while she stumped for the employment of ‘Australian workers before foreigners’, smacked of hypocricy.

Respected as Ms. Gillard might be within Caucus, there’s no escaping the reality that she’s not believed as authentic in the electorate. Neither is she perceived as a strong leader with a personality that engages. Her lack in these areas, is not compensated by gravitas, authority or perceived strength. In short, the recent sartorial style change is not enough to begin to change the public narrative that has been set in concrete for the last two years.

Tanya Plibersek-sm
Health Minister, Tanya Plibersek

It might only be my opinion, but I think last year’s boost for Gillard as preferred prime minister, was more an ‘antidote to Tony Abbott‘ response, than any warming to Julia Gillard. In contrast, Health Minister, Tanya Plibersek, always a star on Q&A (ABC), looks and sounds like the genuine article with a warm personality, a sense of humour and a relaxed, authoritative, competent and compassionate style.

I would not normally counsel a panicked reaction to an election loss or the recent diabolical poll numbers, but in this case, the window of opportunity to change the leader and staunch the bloodbath that will ensue in September, is closing. The next two sitting weeks are the last, the members of the federal Labor caucus will be together, before leaving Canberra until the Budget in May. By that time, the noise of the Budget and its aftermath, will make it difficult for a new prime minister to find any air. As well, the short lead in to September makes it strategically unthinkable to wait that long.

I think the current poll-driven, reactive politics that eschews thoughtful policy and rejects an ideologically infused theory of government, is eroding public support for democracy as well as party membership. I also think the poll-driven dumping of Kevin Rudd in 2010 and Ted Baillieu last week were a symptom of a political system suffering from ‘Anxiety and High Blood Pressure’. And while my call for Julia Gillard to resign might seem to fall into this trend, it is however, rooted in a very long-held belief that she cannot lead the federal ALP to victory. The figures don’t yet show it, but I’m fearful that the looming, but wholly avoidable, disaster for Labor will rival the sad tsunami that hit my hero Gough Whitlam in 1975.

The change must be made by Julia. She can either lead Labor to a humiliating and catastrophic defeat or she can do the right and gracious thing and resign and give her party a chance to recover before September. Caucus members in vulnerable seats, which now even include Defence Minister Stephen Smith (Perth), need to urge the PM to act before it’s too late. This next two weeks is the last real opportunity that exists to make the change and give Labor Caucus members any hope.

If Kevin Rudd hadn’t challenged last year, the obvious choice for transition would be clear as he’s still the most popular politician in Australia. However, It is the most high-risk, high-return option. His 2012 leadership tilt, was an extremely bloody event that provided the Opposition campaign boffins with a Chocolate Box Selection of damaging quotes and footage with which to attack him if he were prime minister.

That leaves the affable Bill Shorten or the telegenic and honest but introverted, Stephen Smith. Defence Minister, Smith might lack a little in charisma but he is eminently authentic and has a reflective, thoughtful style which might be welcomed by an electorate tired of the hyped drama surrounding the humourless, Gillard and the one-dimensional ‘Red Speedo Brawler’, Tony Abbott.

Employment and Workplace Relations Minister, Bill Shorten
Workplace Relations Minister, Bill Shorten

Employment and Workplace Relations Minister, Bill Shorten, another star of Q&A, has an easy ‘Let’s sit down and have a chat’ style that draws you in. His disarmingly quick wit and self-deprecation don’t do him any harm either. He also projects an honest, straight taking manner that contrasts with the Prime Minister. These are all traits the brittle Julia Gillard could use in spades.

Last week’s bloodless coup that saw Ted Baillieu resign as Victorian Premier, adds yet another leadership change story, that should make a federal Labor transition seem a lot more routine than it would have, even just a week ago. As well, it further robs Abbott of the argument that leadership coups are a Labor phenomenon.

Trying to tough it out is not an option; the negative narrative that is attached to Julia Gillard is too strong, sustained and concrete for that. And, make no mistake, Tony Abbott is loathed by as many people as Julia, women in particular. I know many conservative women who openly talk of spoiling their ballot rather than vote for that ‘awful man’. That Labor is as high as 32% on the primary vote, is as much a reflection of the passion of the dislike for Tony Abbott. A ‘Someone-who-isn’t-Tony’ could lead the Opposition and drive the Gillard government even lower in the polls.

Only a circuit breaker that forces the media, the public and the Opposition to find a new field of battle, will give federal Labor any hope of fighting back and maybe even saving itself and Australia from Tony Abbott.

The federal Labor Caucus needs to act now!


Will Julia see the writing on the wall and resign now or will she desperately hang on, and the day after the election, lamely try to explain why the Labor Party lost 30 seats?

:: Please leave a comment ::


Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • March 2022
  • May 2019
  • January 2019
  • January 2017
  • June 2016
  • March 2016
  • September 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014
  • August 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013

Categories

  • Australian Politics
    • Aus Pol. Posts Index
  • Film
    • Film Posts Index (All)
    • Reviews Index (Alpha)
  • Gotta Life
    • Gotta Life Posts Index
  • International Politics
    • Int Pol. Posts Index
  • Religion
    • Religion Posts Index
  • Science
    • Science Posts Index
  • Uncategorized
  • WA Politics
    • WA Pol. Posts Index

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Zak From Downunder
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Zak From Downunder
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...