• About

Zak From Downunder

~ Zak de Courcy's sometimes incendiary thoughts about politics, life and religion.

Zak From Downunder

Tag Archives: Roger Ebert

The Sunday Screening Session….. No Country For Old Men (2007)

21 Sunday Apr 2013

Posted by Zak de Courcy in Film

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

1980, Abandon All Hope, Beth Grant, Carter Burwell, Chase Movie, Coen Brothers, Cormac McCarthy, Crime, Crime Thriller, Drama, El Paso, Ethan and Joel Coen, Film, film review, Garret Dillahunt, In A Minor Key, iRate:: 4½ / 5, Javier Bardem, Joel and Ethan Coen, Josh Brolin, Modern Classic, Nail Biter, No Country for Old Men, Roger Deakins, Roger Ebert, Sunday Screening Session, Texas, Thriller, Tommy Lee Jones, USA, Woody Harrelson

No Country For Old Men (2007) (122 min)
iReview: Version: No Country For Old Men: Blu-ray Edition (Blu-ray);
Video: AVC 1080p; Audio: LPCM 5.1.
Genre:: Crime | Drama | Thriller |
Sub-Genre/Type:: Chase Movie | Crime Thriller |
Modern Classic |
Settings:: 1980 | El Paso, Texas | Texas, USA.
No Country For Old Men
Mood?:: Abandon All Hope |
In A Minor Key | Nail Biter.
iRate:: 4½ / 5
Directors:: Ethan and Joel Coen.
Writers:: Cormac McCarthy (novel: No Country for Old Men);
Ethan and Joel Coen (screenplay).
Cinematography:: Roger Deakins.
Editor:: Roderick Jaynes (Ethan and Joel Coen).
Music:: Carter Burwell.
Cast:: Tommy Lee Jones, Javier Bardem, Josh Brolin, Woody Harrelson, Kelly MacDonald, Beth Grant, Garret Dillahunt, Stephen Root, Jason Douglas, Kit Gwin, Tess Harper, Barry Corbin.

Click for Credits Enlargement
Credits (Click to expand)

Trailer (HD):

iReview:
This week I decided to check out a movie I hadn’t seen before (unbelievably lame, I know), and also from this century: No Country For Old Men (2007). Universally praised and hailed as a filmmakers masterpiece, this movie also attracted an avalanche of awards. Joel and Ethan Coen share the record of four Oscar nominations for the same film with Orson Welles for Citizen Kane (1941) and Warren Beatty for Reds (1981). The Coens’ four nominations are for Best Picture (won as producers with Scott Rudin), Best Director (won), Best Adapted Screenplay (won), and Best Editing (under the pseudonym Roderick Jaynes).

What Happens:
Acclaimed filmmakers Joel and Ethan Coen deliver their most gripping and ambitious film yet in this sizzling and supercharged crime thriller.

When Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin) stumbles on a bloody crime scene, a pickup truck loaded with heroin, and two million dollars in irresistible cash, his decision to take the money sets off an unstoppable chain reaction of violence and his pursuit by a nerveless psychopath, Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem). Not even West Texas lawman, Sheriff Bell (Tommy Lee Jones), can contain it.

“This magnificent film represents the best work the Coen Brothers have done since Fargo. Like that movie classic, this is a cold-blooded thriller with a darkly humorous edge… Hitchcock wouldn’t have done the suspense better.”
(David Stratton, ABC Australia, At The Movies)

“No Country for Old Men is as good a film as the Coen brothers, Joel and Ethan, have ever made, and they made Fargo.”
(Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times)

Click for Story Enlargement
Story (Click to expand)

While this is recognized as the Coen brothers darkest and most tense film, it is not lacking in their signature deadpan humour. I love the way they play with Cormac McCarthy’s language in this script (yes they directed, adapted and edited the whole thing). Here’s an exchange between Deputy Wendell (Garret Dillahunt) and Sheriff Bell (Tommy Lee Jones):
Wendell
“Well, it’s a mess, ain’t it, sheriff?”
Sheriff Bell
“If it ain’t, it’ll do till the mess gets here.”

McCarthy’s writing was clearly destined for the Coens’ delightful and mischievous adaptation. I can imagine the brothers glee as they saw these words; they and Cormac are kindred spirits.

The three main characters are all beautifully drawn: Vietnam vet. Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin), is an expert hunter who happens upon an unhappy scene with perhaps, happy consequence – a slew of bullet-strewn bodies, bullet-ridden trucks, a truckload of drugs and 2 million dollars in cash; Sheriff Ed Tom Bell (Jones), a very competent veteran lawman, the last in this family business, who seems slightly out of his time; and recovery guy, Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem), the unflinching psychopath who carves a murderous path across Texas with his gas bottle and cattle stun-gun.

Brolin is entirely believable as Moss, a man who might just be able to stay one step ahead of the unstoppable Chigurh (pronounced chugar). Tommy Lee Jones, as the slightly world weary Bell, acts his socks off in this. He utterly inhabits the role with exquisite timing and tone, and an understated delivery that tells you he’s at the top of his craft. He also wears the vernacular like a Texas native (oh, hang on a moment, he is). Bardem was born to play Chigurh and he does so with pitch perfect characterization. You just know that if you bumped into Javier on an L.A. street, you’d regret the experience; he’s that good. The three story-anchors are ably supported by Scottish actor, Kelly MacDonald, as Moss’ wife Carla, who had me completely fooled – of course she was a Texan; Woody Harrelson plays himself delivering us Carson Wells, who was sent to end the out of control murder spree and recover the money; and Beth Grant, who gives us a short but memorable turn as Carla’s abrasive mother.

From the stunning red sky silhouette that stamps Roger Deakins’ entry into the film, you know there’s some wonderful photography ahead and he doesn’t disappoint. In much the same way as cinematographer, Tom Stern has become the right hand of director, Clint Eastwood, Deakins has come to exemplify the Coen brothers films. His framing is very precise and in almost all ways, I couldn’t imagine it done better. You only need to watch the featurette: The Making of No Country for Old Men (see extras), to see the contrast between the behind-the-scenes footage, and the finished shots.

The music from Carter Burwell, another staple of the Coen universe, is unobtrusive but appropriate, leaving space for the sound of the wind to weave its magic throughout the film.

I’ve left the best for last… The work of the brothers as directors, writers and editors is near faultless. None of the plot seems forced or contrived, even though the effect of the whole is completely quirky (as you’d expect from a Coen film). The stories of the three central intertwining characters rarely fully intersect yet they are told in such a way that you’re never left wondering. The dialogue is fluid and deliberate without anything superfluous or corny. The tension built by the direction and editing is perfectly fit for purpose with so many near misses and moments of possible discovery which keep us on the edge of the seat. The hotel/motel scenes where Moss and Chigurh never meet, are exercises in pure dread. Add to that, the device of the coin toss which creates another layer of delicious tension. And, like a cat toying with its prey, the Coen brothers leave us guessing which way the coin fell, the final time, until we see Chigurh check the soles of his boots on the path out front.

The luxury of having almost complete control of the film making process is a creative advantage few directors are afforded. Even fewer filmmakers, I suspect, would be able to handle these multiple disciplines with as much finesse as the Coens. Steven Soderbergh has often photographed (as Peter Andrews) and edited (as Mary Ann Bernard) the films he’s directed, with excellent results. However, I wouldn’t rate him quite in the same class as Joel and Ethan Coen. Here, the Coens have employed their extra limb (Deakins) on camera while they have control of every other major aspect of the look of the film. The combination of their shooting script, their dialogue, their direction and their precision editing, is a rhythm that is almost musical. I became conscious of this as I mused over their many cuts and cutaways and realized they were part of a dance which also included the delivery of the dialogue. It’s very clever and something only really achievable if you control the whole shebang as they did.

This would have been an impressive genre movie even if it had a conventional conclusion. But the ending that presents itself here, was so satisfying and original that I found myself laughing completely inappropriately. If you’re one of the other three people who haven’t yet seen this movie then I’m not going to spoil it by telling you.

The Academy got it completely right in awarding the filmmakers their Oscars for this movie; as a lesson in film making it is peerless.

As a critic, Roger Ebert, regularly placed himself in the seat of a genre fan, so he would not necessarily grade on an absolute scale (according to his taste) but rather gave a relative score. Thus on Ebert’s scale, if Superman (1978) scores 4 within the superhero genre, then Hellboy (2004) gets a pretty good 3 (even though Ebert really disliked the film) and The Punisher (2004) only a 2. If I were putting myself in someone else’s seat then, like Ebert (who scored this a 4/4), I’d have to give this 5/5. But, because I want to keep a perfect 5/5 for rare movies that completely blow me away, I am awarding this a 4½ / 5. Jeez, after an explanation like that, it might have been easier just to go the 5.

The Picture:
As you would hope, with a movie of this recent vintage, the screen image is superb. Every craggy wrinkle line, every speck of blood (and there’s a lot of that) and every bullet hole crack in the glass of Moss’ truck, is displayed in brilliant detail. The colours are rich and true and the image, clean with no visible noise.

The Audio:
I wish I’d had the foresight to have bought the Collector’s Edition with its possibly superior DTS 5.1 audio track. As it happens, this Blu-ray LPCM 5.1 sound track is more than adequate. As well, as this isn’t an action flick, the quality of audio reproduction isn’t quite as critical. There were times when the balance between speakers fell short of ideal. For example, occasionally, the right front and left surround channels dominated, leaving the left front unbalanced and slightly out of the mix. Apart from these occasional anomalies, though, the audio field sounded fine.

Verdict:
I’m embarrassed that it has taken me this long to see this movie, especially as I’ve had it in the library for some time. In a way though, I’m glad I waited because I think I can now appreciate the virtuosity of its construction a lot more than I would have only a few years ago. It’s a filmmakers tour de force and a film I’ll likely learn more from with each viewing.

iRate:: 4½ out of 5.

4Movie Tragics

Extras:
• The Making of No Country for Old Men (as well as the usual filmmaker discussion about inspiration and script development, there’s some interesting behind-the-scenes action from the set… an interesting featurette) – 24min.
• Working with the Coens (this is pretty much a PR gushfest) – 8min;
• Diary of a Country Sheriff (this character featurette looks at Sheriff Bell from a number of angles and compares him with Chigurh… enjoyable without being essential) – 7min;

You want More!
No Country For Old Men – IMDb (Internet Movie Database)
No Country For Old Men – Rotten Tomatoes
No Country For Old Men – allmovie.com
No Country For Old Men – Wikipedia


Is this the best movie by the Coen brothers or does Fargo still top the list?
Have I got it completely wrong and has Stephen Hunter got it right in his Washington Post review, when he abruptly states, “I just don’t like it very much”?


:: Please leave a comment ::


The Sunday Screening Session….. Apocalypse Now (1979)

14 Sunday Apr 2013

Posted by Zak de Courcy in Film

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

1970s, Abandon All Hope, Adventure, Adventure Drama, Albert Hall, Anti-War Film, Apocalypse Now, Apocalypse Now Redux, Cambodia, Cold War Film, Dennis Hopper, Drama, Epic, Film, film review, Francis Ford Coppola, Frederic Forrest, Guy Movie, iRate:: 5 / 5, John Milius, Jungle Film, Laurence Fishburne, Marlon Brando, Martin Sheen, Modern Classic, Robert Duvall, Roger Ebert, Sam Bottoms, Slow Burn, Starpower, Sunday Screening Session, Vietnam, Vietnam War Era, War, War Epic

Apocalypse Now (1979) (196 min)
iReview: Version: Apocalypse Now: Full Disclosure Edition (Blu-ray);
Video: AVC 1080p; Audio: DTS 5.1.
Genre:: Adventure | Drama | Epic | War |
Sub-Genre/Type:: Adventure Drama | Anti-War Film |
Cold War Film | Jungle Film | Modern Classic | War Epic |
Settings:: 1970s | Cambodia | Vietnam | Vietnam War Era.
Apocalypse-Now-305
Mood?:: Abandon All Hope | Guy Movie |
Slow Burn | Starpower.
iRate:: 5 / 5 (One of my top 10)
Director:: Francis Ford Coppola.
Writers:: Joseph Conrad (novella: Heart of Darkness); Michael Herr (narration); Francis Ford Coppola & John Milius (screenplay).
Cast:: Marlon Brando, Martin Sheen, Robert Duvall, Frederic Forrest, Sam Bottoms, Albert Hall, Laurence Fishburne, Dennis Hopper, Harrison Ford, G. D. Spradlin, Jerry Ziesmer, Scott Glenn.

Click for Credits Enlargement
Credits (Click to expand)

Trailer (HD):
https://youtu.be/apo6_iOe0Jw

iReview:
With the death of famed Chicago Sun-Times critic, Roger Ebert (see my earlier Ebert post), I thought I’d have a look at one of his and my top 10 movies, Apocalypse Now. I recently obtained the 3 disc Full Disclosure Blu-ray Edition which includes the movie tragics must-have Hearts of Darkness: A Filmmaker’s Apocalypse, the 1991 documentary chronicling the making of the film. The package also includes the 1979 cut of Apocalypse Now and an ammo dump full of interesting extras. I wasn’t able to source this set in-store so I was forced to find it online (I’ve included convenient links to search on eBay and Amazon (UK) below).

What Happens:
Francis Ford Coppola adapted the Joseph Conrad novella Heart of Darkness (set in the Belgian Congo, Africa) to depict the Vietnam War as a descent into primal madness. Capt. Benjamin Willard (Martin Sheen), already on the edge, is assigned a secret mission to find and deal with AWOL Col. Kurtz (Marlon Brando), who has set himself up in the Cambodian jungle as a cult warlord. Along the way up-river, Willard encounters: the lover of napalm and Wagner, Col. Kilgore (Robert Duvall); soldiers who prefer to surf and do drugs: a troupe of USO Playboy Bunnies, whose show turns into a riot; and a manic photographer (Dennis Hopper), who tells wild, reverential stories about Kurtz. By the time Willard sees the scattering of heads at Kurtz’s compound, he knows Kurtz has gone insane…

Click for Story Enlargement
Story (Click to expand)

It’s been many years since I saw the 2001 Redux version of this film and a year or so since my last visit with the original 1979 cut, so I arrived for this marathon sitting of Redux with relatively fresh eyes.

Now that I know Martin Sheen (Capt. Benjamin Willard) was actually very drunk when filming the first bedroom scene in which he did his best to destroy the set, the scene has acquired added significance. The blood was also real as Sheen cut his hand in the process. This scene becomes emblematic of the production chaos of the Philippines’ shoot, with a typhoon destroying the set and Sheen’s near fatal heart attack (which was kept secret, with his hospitalization ascribed to ‘heat exhaustion’). The intrigue surrounding the production is one of the things that makes the warts-and-all Hearts of Darkness: A Filmmaker’s Apocalypse documentary (on disc 3), compiled from footage shot by Eleanor Coppola, so compelling. There’s the revelation that half the cast were using marijuana, speed or LSD or all three, and often while filming. Add to that, the news that Laurence Fishburne (Clean) lied about his age to get the part as he was only 14 when filming began; that a nearby Islamic insurgency resulted in the frequent and sudden departure, often while filming, of the leased Philippines military helicopters, called away to battle; that the scheduled 6 week shoot was repeatedly extended to an eventual 16 months; that shooting delays resulted in Brando pocketing his already paid $1 million advance on his $1 million per week salary and almost walking away, rather than reschedule his three weeks on set; that Brando arrived dramatically overweight and concerned about his appearance and required that only scenes showing him in shadow be included in the film; that Brando arrived completely unprepared having read neither the novel (Heart of Darkness) or the script (something he was notorious for); that Brando insisted on detailed consultation with Coppola, sometimes lasting days, before improvising scenes, all while the cast and crew were waiting on standby; and that the budget blew out to $40 million, a record at the time. There’s also the shocking and highly confronting footage of the ritual, brutal killing of pigs and the hacking to death of the water buffalo that appears at film’s end (I think its eyes will haunt me for a very long time). The documentary also brilliantly illuminates the insanity of the shoot which seemed to mirror the insanity of the Vietnam War and the madness on screen. If you don’t want your viewing of the film to be tainted, I’d recommend you leave this documentary ’til last.

Apocalypse Now was always episodic, as road movies often are, with set pieces revealed as Willard and the river patrol boat crew, progress up the Nung River towards Cambodia. But in Redux, this aspect of the story is accentuated with the addition of scenes featuring the stranded ‘Bunnies’ and the French colonial plantation compound.

After so many previous viewings, there’s still the pleasure of anticipation, waiting for the arrival of Colonel Bill Kilgore (Robert Duvall) who leads his airborne chopper cavalry and is surfing obsessed, seemingly invulnerable, and just loves “the smell of napalm in the morning”. He also has a lust for mass carnage, accompanied by a bellowing rendition of “Ride of the Valkyries” by Wagner.

Next up the river, there’s the USO show featuring the troupe of Playboy Bunnies, who arrive by chopper, parade provocatively, get mobbed in a riotous scramble, and retreat to their chopper in a cloud of smoke.

By the time I’d arrived at the chaotic MedEvac station with the stranded ‘Bunnies’, the first major departure from the 1979 version, I realized I needed to see the original again to put Redux into perspective (hence the delay in publishing this post). And frankly, while the original stand-alone USO Bunnies show scene, illustrates the detachment of US resolve and ineffectiveness in war fighting, the added MedEvac scene seems an unnecessary adjunct which muddies (excuse the pun) the thread of the story and adds only a negative aesthetic to the movie.

Moving up the river, Chief (Albert Hall) spots a sampan and, against Willard’s advice, they stop and search the boat. As Chef (Frederic Forrest) belligerently searches the sampan, Clean (Laurence Fishburne) unexpectedly opens fire on the boat. What ensues is the My Lai Massacre moment of the movie.

With each encounter, as they progress further from civilization, the crew’s grip on sanity wavers a little more. By the time they reach the chaotic Do Long bridge outpost with its precarious suspension bridge and no discernible chain of command, Willard and his men seem like an island of calm in a swirling nightmare.

I’m neutral about the efficacy of the added French colonials scene in Redux. At the time of the release of the 1979 cut, the Vietnam War was still extremely raw in the American Psyche, having ended only 4 years earlier. It’s perhaps understandable then, that Coppola decided not to pollute the ‘descent into the madness of America’s Vietnam War‘ theme with a discourse on the colonial era. Thirty four years later, that anti-Vietnam War focus of the film, perhaps, doesn’t need to be so sharply defined, so the departure into French colonial history adds an interesting side-track. Filming it at all may have been a subtle nod to Conrad’s original Heart of Darkness, set in the French speaking, Belgian Congo colony.

The horrific scenes awaiting what’s left of the crew, when they arrive at Kurtz’s compound, seem entirely appropriate, given the portents that accompanied their journey.

Coppola’s additional Kurtz Compound scenes in Redux, add another layer of insight along with subtle changes to Kurtz’s character. In the original, Kurtz was made more poetically enigmatic by his shadowy illumination. In Redux, Kurtz is just plain mad. At the time of production, Marlon Brando was something of an actor demi-god, so it was understandable that he and Coppola were concerned that his obesity might be an unwelcome distraction, hence the noirish camera work. With Brando’s immensity no longer a novelty, it’s interesting to see the additional ‘lit’ scenes as they ‘flesh’ out Kurtz’s personality (stop with the puns, already!).

This intense week-long immersion into the Apocalypse Now universe has been fascinating for me and has led to the conclusion that on balance, I marginally prefer the original cut to Redux. However, they each stand, in their own right, as monumentally stunning achievements in film-making. Watching both films in reasonably close proximity, also gave me an unexpected look behind the curtain to the art behind movie-making, as I was able to see great examples of the editor’s craft. That for me was worth the price of admission (in this case the cost of the Blu-ray set).

The Picture:
I’m pleased that Coppola prevailed with the 2.35:1 aspect ratio rather than Cinematographer, Vittorio Storaro’s preferred 2.0:1 (used on previous releases) which chopped the frame and occasionally caused oddly skewed shot framing and pans.

This transfer to Blu-ray while not quite as stunning as some I’ve seen recently (I’ve been spoilt), is nevertheless beautifully rendered and a pleasure to watch. It might just have been me, but this new Blu-ray palette also seems to have a slightly heavier yellow hue than previous versions, giving the image a warmer look than I’d like (it’s OK, I’m already kicking myself for nit-picking).

Overall, the screen image is clean and well defined with Kurtz’s disembodied head brilliantly defined and contrasted against deep black. Also look out for the way Willard’s face is lit while he reads the Kurtz dossier on the deck of the patrol boat. And let’s face it, Storaro’s photography is breathtakingly sumptuous, especially in the film’s first half. I’m also conscious of the fact that Coppola needed to incorporate previously discarded footage, which can’t have been easy, and then colour grade both films for consistency. To have created such a seamless result is astonishing. If you need confirmation of just how good it is, check out Richard Donner’s 2006 cut of Superman II which is good but not nearly as consistent as Apocalypse.

The Audio:
The Blu-ray DTS 5.1 sound track is one of the best I’ve heard, particularly the woofer’s rumbling bass. The balance and sweep of the sound effects mix is awesome with helicopters tracking seamlessly from monitor to monitor. The sound field is completely immersive, especially at higher volume (I hope the neighbours weren’t too annoyed).

My only complaint about the soundtrack is an issue of personal taste: I would have much preferred a score without the heavy and dated synthesizer. A completely contemporary rock track or even an orchestral score would have been fine. Unfortunately, the mix of great ’60s and ’70s rock tracks interspersed with nondescript synth. just didn’t do it for me.

Verdict:
This movie was already in my top ten so my expectations of this release were high. I’m so pleased that Coppola has allowed his two versions of Apocalypse Now to co-exist as they are each wonderful in their own way. I’d say, if anything, this new Blu-ray package with its incomparable set of extras, has enhanced my impression of the films. So hats off to the guys who took such care putting this together.

iRate:: 5 out of 5 (One of my top 10).


4Movie Tragics

Buy:
• Apocalypse Now: Full Disclosure Blu-ray Edition (at eBay)
• look for Apocalypse Now: Full Disclosure Blu-ray Edition / 3-disc Special Edition (at Amazon UK).
(note: Any UK Blu-ray is playable in Australia as they share the same region code ‘B‘ (USA code is ‘A‘). Just to confuse things though, be aware that their DVD region codes are different – Region: 2 (UK), 4 (Aus), 1 (USA). But many UK DVDs are coded for both regions (2 & 4), so check.)

Extras:
• Feature Commentary by Director Francis Ford Coppola (complements the Hearts of Darkness: A Filmmaker’s Apocalypse documentary quite well. I’d be inclined to listen to the commentary on Redux, as it’s full of interesting production notes and anecdotes. As well, the commentary track for the original version was edited down from this one).

Disc Two:
• A Conversation With Martin Sheen
(Sheen and Coppola reminisce about the casting, drugs, alcohol, tigers, the heart attack, and much more… interesting) – 59min;
• An Interview With John Milius (here Coppola and Milius discuss their writing process and the script’s evolution as they drill deeply into the screenplay. They also briefly touch on Milius’ own military ambitions and how that played into the screenplay… one for the geeks and illuminating and enjoyable) – 50min;
• Fred Roos: Casting Apocalypse (includes screen test footage and features the film’s casting director, Roos, talking about the hundreds of actors tested for various roles) – 12min;
• ‘Apocalypse’ Then and Now (has some brief snippets from Roger Ebert’s Cannes interview with Francis Ford Coppola) – 4min;
• 2001 Cannes Film Festival: Francis Ford Coppola (the entire Ebert Cannes interview) – 39min;
• PBR Streetgang (profiles and reflections from the actors playing Willard’s patrol boat crew: Laurence Fishburne, Sam Bottoms, Albert Hall, and Frederic Forrest) – 4min;
• “Monkey Sampan” Deleted Scene (a disturbing deleted segment featuring a boat overrun with monkeys and natives singing “Light My Fire”) – 3min;
• Additional Scenes (12 timecoded scenes including Lt. Richard M. Colby (Scott Glenn) dialogue and undoctored footage where the name of Brando’s original character name, Col. Leighley, can be heard) – 26min;
• Destruction of the Kurtz Compound (the jettisoned final credits sequence which Coppola ultimately rejected when he feared audiences were misinterpreting it) – 6min;
• The Birth of 5.1 Sound
(a fascinating Dolby Labs presentation which looks at how Apocalypse Now led to a revolution in film surround sound design) – 6min;
• Ghost Helicopter Flyover
(sound engineer, Richard Beggs, explains how the surround sound design for the opening helicopter sequence was created) – 4min;
• The Music of Apocalypse Now (looks at how the various musical elements: The Doors, synthesizer music, orchestral and percussion work were integrated together) – 15min.
• The Synthesizer Soundtrack (a text screen reprint of a Bob Moog article from Keyboard magazine);
• Heard Any Good Movies Lately? The Sound Design of ‘Apocalypse Now‘ (Coppola, Walter Murch, Richard Beggs, and post-production recordist Randy Thom talk about and show us how the revolutionary sound design for the film was created) – 15min;
• A Million Feet of Film: The Editing of ‘Apocalypse Now‘ (a great look at how Coppola and editor Walter Murch pulled a coherant film together from the immense stock of scripted, experimental and improvised footage) – 18min;
• The Final Mix (Randy Thom introduces some great footage of the multi-room setup which was necessary to achieve the final mix for the film) – 3min;
• The Color Palette of ‘Apocalypse Now‘ (Vittorio Storaro attempts to explain the technical aspects of the three strip dye transfer Technicolor process utilized on the film) – 4min.
• The Hollow Men (an odd little period (circa 1979) featurette with Brando reciting Eliot’s poem with scenes from the film and the shoot) – 17min;
• Mercury Theater Production of ‘Heart of Darkness’ (audio presentation of Orson Welles production of Joseph Conrad’s novella… some of the audio quality has suffered with time.) – 37min.

Disc Three:
• Hearts of Darkness: A Filmmaker’s Apocalypse (the fascinating behind-the-scenes documentary compiled from home movie footage shot by Coppola’s wife Eleanor. The film includes audio from tapes she recorded without Francis’ knowledge for what she, at the time, expected to turn into a diary. The chaos and intrigue surrounding the making of the film, makes this compelling viewing. As if that’s not enough, there’s also an optional and very interesting commentary track from the Coppola’s.) – 99min.
• John Milius Script Selections with Notes by Francis Ford Coppola
(text screens);
• Storyboard Gallery (with more than 200 screens);
• Photo Archive (a huge trove of production and candid stills together with some Mary Ellen Mark photography);
• Marketing Archive (featuring the 1979 trailer, radio spots, theatrical program, lobby cards, press kit photos, and a poster gallery).

Printed Material:
• A 48-page Full Disclosure booklet which features a written introduction from Francis Ford Coppola, script excerpts (with notes scrawled over them), production photos, storyboards, sketches, and other production art.
• An Apocalypse Now booklet with production notes, credits and cast and crew biographies.
• 5 Black & White postcards.

You want More!
Apocalypse Now – IMDb (Internet Movie Database)
Apocalypse Now – Rotten Tomatoes
Apocalypse Now Redux – Rotten Tomatoes
Apocalypse Now – allmovie.com
Apocalypse Now Redux – allmovie.com
Apocalypse Now – Wikipedia
Apocalypse Now Redux – Wikipedia


Is this the best war film ever made?

:: Please leave a comment ::


The Dean of Movie Critics, Roger Ebert is Dead:

05 Friday Apr 2013

Posted by Zak de Courcy in Film

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Chicago Sun-Times, Film, film review, Roger Ebert

ImageFor movie lovers the world over, today is a very sad day. The most famous of all film critics, Roger Ebert, has died aged 70 after a long battle with cancer.

In 1967 he joined the Chicago Sun-Times as their film critic and had worked continuously since (with a short break in 2006/7 for cancer treatment). Through the years he gained a formidable reputation and was the first critic awarded a Pulitzer Prize for his work.

With partners, first Gene Siskel, then Richard Roeper, Ebert enjoyed success with syndicated television shows, including the long-running At The Movies. In his almost 50 years of criticism, he produced more than 9,000 reviews, a record that’s unlikely to be beaten.

He described his critical style as relativist saying,
“When you ask a friend if Hellboy is any good, you’re not asking if it’s any good compared to Mystic River, you’re asking if it’s any good compared to The Punisher. And my answer would be, on a scale of one to four, if Superman is four, then Hellboy is three and The Punisher is two. In the same way, if American Beauty gets four stars, then The United States of Leland clocks in at about two.”

Although Roger Ebert wasn’t a fan of “top ten” lists, or movie lists in general, he still contributed his top ten to the 2012 British Film Institute’s Sight and Sound Critics’ poll. Listed alphabetically, those films were 2001: A Space Odyssey, Aguirre, the Wrath of God, Apocalypse Now, Citizen Kane, La Dolce Vita, The General, Raging Bull, Tokyo Story, The Tree of Life and Vertigo.

In 1968, when 2001: A Space Odyssey was released, many respected critics realized what a landmark it was, including Ebert, while others like Renata Adler of The New York Times, were short on praise. Adler wrote that the movie was “somewhere between hypnotic and immensely boring”.

In tribute to Roger Ebert, here is his 1968 review of one of my favourite films: 2001: A Space Odyssey.
It was e. e. cummings, the poet, who said he’d rather learn from one bird how to sing than teach 10,000 stars how not to dance. I imagine cummings would not have enjoyed Stanley Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey,” in which stars dance but birds do not sing. The fascinating thing about this film is that it fails on the human level but succeeds magnificently on a cosmic scale.

Kubrick’s universe, and the space ships he constructed to explore it, are simply out of scale with human concerns. The ships are perfect, impersonal machines which venture from one planet to another, and if men are tucked away somewhere inside them, then they get there too.

But the achievement belongs to the machine. And Kubrick’s actors seem to sense this; they are lifelike but without emotion, like figures in a wax museum. Yet the machines are necessary because man himself is so helpless in the face of the universe.

Kubrick begins his film with a sequence in which one tribe of apes discovers how splendid it is to be able to hit the members of another tribe over the head. Thus do man’s ancestors become tool-using animals.

At the same time, a strange monolith appears on Earth. Until this moment in the film, we have seen only natural shapes: earth and sky and arms and legs. The shock of the monolith’s straight edges and square corners among the weathered rocks is one of the most effective moments in the film. Here, you see, is perfection. The apes circle it warily, reaching out to touch, then jerking away. In a million years, man will reach for the stars with the same tentative motion.

Who put the monolith there? Kubrick never answers, for which I suppose we must be thankful. The action advances to the year 2001, when explorers on the moon find another of the monoliths. This one beams signals toward Jupiter. And man, confident of his machines, brashly follows the trail.

Only at this point does a plot develop. The ship manned by two pilots, Keir Dullea and Gary Lockwood. Three scientists are put on board in suspended animation to conserve supplies. The pilots grow suspicious of the computer, “Hal,” which runs the ship. But they behave so strangely — talking in monotones like characters from “Dragnet” — that we’re hardly interested.

There is hardly any character development in the plot, then, as a result little suspense. What remains fascinating is the fanatic care with which Kubrick has built his machines and achieved his special effects. There is not a single moment, in this long film, when the audience can see through the props. The stars look like stars and outer space is bold and bleak.

Some of Kubrick’s effects have been criticized as tedious. Perhaps they are, but I can understand his motives. If his space vehicles move with agonizing precision, wouldn’t we have laughed if they’d zipped around like props on “Captain Video”? This is how it would really be, you find yourself believing.

In any event, all the machines and computers are forgotten in this astonishing last half-hour of this film, and man somehow comes back into his own. Another monolith is found beyond Jupiter, pointing to the stars. It apparently draws the spaceship into a universe where time and space are twisted.

What Kubrick is saying, in the final sequence, apparently, is that man will eventually outgrow his machines, or be drawn beyond them by some cosmic awareness. He will then become a child again, but a child of an infinitely more advanced, more ancient race, just as apes once became, to their own dismay, the infant stage of man.

And the monoliths? Just road markers, I suppose, each one pointing to a destination so awesome that the traveler cannot imagine it without being transfigured. Or as cummings wrote on another occasion, “listen — there’s a hell of a good universe next door; let’s go.”

Roger, you’ll be greatly missed. – 4/4 and two thumbs up.

Also check out:
• Roger Ebert as a Builder of an Empire by David Carr
(New York Times – April 7, 2013)


Do you have any impressions or recollections of Roger that you’d like to share?

:: Please leave a comment ::


Mea Maxima Culpa: Silence in the House of God (2012 HBO) – A film about child sexual abuse that everyone should see.

07 Thursday Mar 2013

Posted by Zak de Courcy in Film, Religion

≈ 7 Comments

Tags

catholic church, child sex abuse, documentary, Father Lawrence Murphy, Father Tony Walsh, film review, hbo, Joseph Ratzinger, pedophile, Pope Benedict XVI, priests, religion, Roger Ebert, sex abuse, Sir Geoffrey Robertson, St. John School

Just got through watching the award-winning HBO documentary, Mea Maxima Culpa: Silence in the House of God, looking at sexual abuse of children. The film examines the abuse of power in the Catholic Church system via the story of four men who fought to expose the priest, Father Lawrence Murphy who abused them during the mid 1960s. Fr. Murphy taught at the St. John School for the Deaf in Milwaukee, Wisconsin from 1950 until 1974 when he was moved to St. Anne’s Church, Boulder Junction in the north of Wisconsin, following repeated allegations from students and a priest, Fr. Walsh, who visited the school in 1963. However, Murphy was not removed from contact with children and continued to abuse boys in Boulder Junction and other parishes, schools, and a juvenile correction facility, for the next 24 years. During his time at the St. John School, Murphy was believed to have molested as many as 200 boys.

The film peels back the layers of secrecy, obfuscation and deception that characterised the church’s response to allegations in this case and that of another charismatic priest in Ireland, Fr. Tony Walsh, a member of the popular “The Singing Priests”, who was revealed as Ireland’s most notorious pedophile in 2010. However, it was also revealed that the church had been aware of his activities for more than 20 years but took no practical action to protect children. What the film-makers reveal is that, far from these cases being isolated, there are thousands of similar stories all over the world, and that secrecy and cover-up has been the policy of the church for centuries.

There have been several good films that have exposed this issue in recent years, including Deliver Us From Evil (2006) and Twist of Faith (2004).
Perhaps what’s different about this film, is that the film-makers follow each case through the upward hierarchy of the Church before pointing the finger directly at then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who in 2001 took over responsibility for the personal review of all child sexual abuse cases involving Catholic clergy, world-wide. In 2005, he became Pope Benedict XVI. Now I think I have a clearer idea of one of the main reasons why he had to resign his office. Prominent human rights lawyer Sir Geoffrey Robertson QC, says it could be argued that the man’s degree of negligence over the child abuse scandals “involves him in a crime against humanity”.

World renowned film reviewer, Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times wrote a very personal review, saying, “To someone who was raised and educated in the Catholic school system, as I was, a film like this inspires shock and outrage.” He also wrote that the film “is calm and steady, founded largely on the testimony of Murphy’s victims.”

I came away after seeing this with such a feeling of outrage that I think it’s time to call the Catholic Church what it is, a systematically evil organisation. There are a lot of good people trying to do good work in the name of this church but I think the stench of the management of this global corporation has infected them all. If this were any other non-religious organisation, the leadership would probably be in prison and the business would almost certainly have been forced into liquidation. Imagine the good that would come from the distribution of the sale of the hundreds of billions in assets, owned by this extraordinarily wealthy exemplar for the man who walked in a simple cloth and owned nothing, Jesus (I think people might be shocked by the staggering quantity of properties, you didn’t know were owned and rented out by the Roman Catholic Church and its various holding trusts world-wide).

At the very least, the church needs to stop the legal stonewalling of the kind that rendered the recent Irish Child Abuse Commission, so ineffectual that not a single criminal priest was charged as a result.

It’s one thing for a secular corporation to use every legal and P.R. tactic they can, in an adversarial legal system, to delay or avoid justice; that’s expected of such amoral entities. However, for The Roman Catholic Church to use such amoral tactics in support of accused clergy, flies in the face of their avowed moral role in society. The Church needs to accept that the welfare of victims of sex-abuse by clergy, comes before that of the perpetrators, and that they are liable for compensation that is going to cost tens of billions. If authorities need a non-confrontational model for the adjudication and distribution of settlements to victims, perhaps they could look at the Danish Public Health Service Complaints Board for inspiration.

The people who protected these criminal clergy, like Boston’s Cardinal Bernard Law (who resigned in 2002, after church documents were revealed which suggested he had covered up sexual abuse committed by priests in his archdiocese) need to be ‘hung out to dry’ when their heinous actions are exposed, rather than promoted to palaces in the Vatican as was Law.

Church records also need to be opened to allow for the discovery of criminal priests and brothers so they can be prosecuted, giving victims some justice and closure.

It’s time to end this!


I’d welcome your comments on this very tough subject.

:: Please leave a comment ::


Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • March 2022
  • May 2019
  • January 2019
  • January 2017
  • June 2016
  • March 2016
  • September 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014
  • August 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013

Categories

  • Australian Politics
    • Aus Pol. Posts Index
  • Film
    • Film Posts Index (All)
    • Reviews Index (Alpha)
  • Gotta Life
    • Gotta Life Posts Index
  • International Politics
    • Int Pol. Posts Index
  • Religion
    • Religion Posts Index
  • Science
    • Science Posts Index
  • Uncategorized
  • WA Politics
    • WA Pol. Posts Index

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Zak From Downunder
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Zak From Downunder
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...